As you have no doubt heard by now, the NCAA today turned down Jeremiah Masoli‘s request for a waiver that would have allowed the quarterback to play immediately for Ole Miss.
Ole Miss filed its appeal of the ruling by a 1 p.m. CT deadline in the hopes that they will receive a response from the NCAA as early as Friday, a day before the season opener. The school also held a press conference to address the latest development, and questioned the decision handed down by the governing body of collegiate sports.
Athletic director Pete Boone stated that there were two reasons given by the NCAA for the denial. One, “Jeremiah would not have been eligible for the 2010 season at his previous institution.” Masoli had been suspended for the 2010 season by Oregon head coach Chip Kelly following his guilty plea in a burglary case, and was then dismissed from the Ducks football program — but not the school — following a second arrest, this one involving marijuana possession.
The second reason given by the NCAA, Boone said, was a “time-frame discrepancy between the previous institution and Jeremiah regarding when the institution said they dismissed Jeremiah [and] when he decided to transfer.” Part of Ole Miss’ appeal will apparently be based on the fact that they believe Masoli began considering a transfer before he was dismissed from the UO football program. ”Regarding the time discrepancies with the recollections of the institution and Jeremiah, the staff attempted to determine when Jeremiah started thinking about a transfer. This is a difficult task for anyone to try and accomplish.”
Head coach Houston Nutt also stressed Boone’s stance that Masoli was dismissed from the football team, not the school.
“He was not dismissed from the university, which is very clear in the rules,” Nutt said. “He was not dismissed from the university. He was dismissed from the team. I have players that I have dismissed. I want them to go play for somebody else. I want them to learn from their mistakes. I want them to be a better person. There’s no question in my mind, Jeremiah’s at the right place.”
In its press release regarding their decision, the NCAA very heavily intimated that Masoli was not in compliance with the spirit of the transfer rule due to the fact that he had been dismissed from the Oregon football program.
“In its decision, the staff noted the student-athlete was unable to participate at the University of Oregon based on his dismissal from the team, which is contrary to the intent of the waiver. The waiver exists to provide relief to student-athletes who transfer for academic reasons to pursue graduate studies, not to avoid disciplinary measures at the previous university.”
And you know what? The NCAA is 100-percent, absolutely correct in their handling of this ruling. The rule was not intended for convicted criminals to have the ability to circumvent being dismissed from one program to go play immediately for another even as they may technically adhere to the applicable rules that would grant non-criminals immediate eligibility.
With that said, Ole Miss is feeling very confident that they will win their appeal and Masoli will be eligible to play in 2010 instead of having to redshirt and (possibly) return in 2011.
“It is our opinion that they’re decision was subjective and not weighted toward the best interests and opportunity of the student-athlete Jeremiah Masoli,” Boone said. “We are appealing, and we hope that the members of the sub-committee on appeals will see the reasons that are favorable in our light and for the benefit of Jeremiah Masoli.”
I’m am glad to see that they are trying to clean up college sports. What was Ole Miss thinking?
As much as I am glad to see the NCAA doing the right thing, and disagree with everything Jeremiah Masoli IS… I wanted to see him play this year.
I wanted to see an athletic kid get out there and perform for a school that hasn’t had a good quarterback since Eli Manning.
What if Masoli was enough to help Ole Miss beat Alabama? That could change EVERYTHING in college sports, from the SEC West representative in the SEC title game, to one of the two BCS National Championship contenders.
Part of me hopes the Rebels win the appeal. But, if justice wins, then I will be happy to wait to 2011… hopefully seeing Masoli play.
@ Sean Martin
Agree 100% w/ you. Great post!
NCAA made the right decision–Houston Nutt could care less about what’s in the best interest of Jeremiah Masoli he just saw an opportunity to win 2 or 3 extra games and that is the ONLY thing he cared about.
This is a done deal as Nutt, Mississippi & Masoli have NO chance to win the appeal.
Masoli said he “hope the NCAA finds it in their heart to do the right thing”? Are you kidding me? Did he find it in his heart to steal the laptop…you’re a thief. Pay the punishment, and sit out a year.
He’s lucky he’ll ever be allowed to play. This is what I have a problem with:
1st offense: Burglary, even if with a plea should have been sentenced to jail time if only 30 days and then probation.
2nd offense: Marijuana possession, still misdemeanor but certainly strike two.
He should not be given any more of a chance than the many many others we read about weekly who have endangered not only a season but the rest of their lives with needless disrespect for the law!
OK Masoli is a punk to a degree and he’s brought everything on himself. However, if the rules allow for him to play, you have to let him play. You can’t change the rules when it doesn’t fit your liking. Loopholes have to be changed by the rules committee. You can’t just say if violates the spirit of the rules. What kind of justice is that?
Ok the NCAA got this right? First they pass a rule, and you can argue whether it is a good one or not. Second, they allow several people to take advantage of it, some almost identical to the Masoli case. Third they deny him a waiver after three weeks of practice and 4 days before opening kickoff, citing that it was not “in the spirit of the intention.” First of all what is right about that? If they did not like their own rule then change it, rather than make a value judgements over the supposed intention. This shows the incompetence of the NCAA, and it sad this group of elitist condescending tools run college sports.