Saban takes a jab at Boise State title talk


“Should Boise State be in the national championship discussion?”

Throughout the preseason and, especially, after Boise State’s 33-30 win over Virginia Tech Monday night, that’s a question that’s been asked of a Broncos team that’s suddenly turned from Cinderella to the wicked stepmother of college football.

From fans’ comments on this site to gallons of ink being spilled by major newspaper columnists to talking heads on TV/radio, everyone seems to have two copper Lincolns as to Boise State’s worthiness in being mentioned amongst the big boys and their pursuit of the BcS crystal.

You can now count Nick Saban amongst the everyone.

Speaking on his weekly radio show, the Alabama head coach took a shot at Boise State, hinting that if the Broncos were in his conference and had to run through their gauntlet of league foes — not just one game against the Hokies — it might be a different story.

He noted that Alabama defeated Virginia Tech in its 2009 opener and defeated “six other teams that were the caliber of Virginia Tech, or maybe better. And maybe more than that if you throw in Texas and Florida in the SEC Championship Game. …”

“It’s the full body of work. It’s not just that you can beat one team, but if you have to beat six or seven other teams and have to play with consistency to do it, I think that goes a long way in saying a lot about what kind of football team that you have. And that’s no disrespect that you have, because they may certainly be able to do the same thing if they were put in that circumstance.”

First of all, who were these six presumably SEC teams in 2009 — in addition to Florida and Texas — that Saban’s team hurdled en route to the national title and were equal to or better than the Hokies?  LSU?  Georgia?  Ole Miss or Arkansas?  Tennessee under Kiffin?  Please with your six-plus, Coach Woodcock.

Certainly I have a very, very high opinion of the SEC, too high based on some of the comments in many of my posts; Saban’s, however, is the reason a good chunk of college football despises the conference.

Secondly, and to address Saban’s quasi-quality final thought, you simply don’t know what would happen if Boise State were to be dropped into the middle of the SEC.  Or the Big Ten.  Or the Pac-10 (The Big East is another story, though; that’s a league title and automatic BcS berth right there).  Certainly there can be conjecture, but the “put them in the (conference name) and they wouldn’t even finish .500” take is one of the most patently asinine arguments in the sports world today.  Such a concrete statement on a what-if argument is a stance of the feeble-minded, too weak to wrap their heads around anything but the most simplistic of concepts and too self-centered to realize that football is played at a very high level outside the South/Midwest/Texas.

Of course, there is a one way that this argument could be solved, at least in part.

A playoff.

Oops, never mind.  The weak of mind can’t wrap their heads around that simple concept, either.

Appalachian State announces five-year extension for head coach Scott Satterfield

Scott Satterfield
Associated Press
1 Comment

One day after it was revealed its head coach was the second-lowest paid in college football, Appalachian State announced a five-year contract extension for head coach Scott Satterfield.

“We have the right coach leading our football program in Scott Satterfield,” Appalachian State AD Doug Gillin said in a statement. “In nearly three years as head coach, he has stayed true to his convictions, built the program the right way and set Appalachian State football up for sustainable success both in the Sun Belt Conference and at the national level.”

Satterfield had earned $375,000 annually, ahead of only Louisiana-Monroe’s Todd Berry at $360,000 a year.

Satterfield, 42, is 14-14 in his third season at the Boone, N.C., school. He led the Mountaineers to a 7-5 mark in their debut Sun Belt season, and has the club at 3-1 to start the 2015 campaign.

“It’s exciting for my family and me to know that we’re going to be at Appalachian for the foreseeable future,” Satterfield added. “I’m living a dream by being the head coach at my alma mater and can’t wait to continue to work hard to help this program reach heights that it has never reached before.”

Wisconsin announces 10-year agreement with Under Armour

Joel Stave
Associated Press

What has long been rumored became fact Friday, as Wisconsin announced a 10-year agreement with Under Armour.

“I am absolutely thrilled about our new partnership with Under Armour,” AD Barry Alvarez said in a statement. “Kevin Plank and his team have established a brand that fits perfectly with the Wisconsin athletics story and culture. Our primary focus at Wisconsin is, of course, our student-athletes, and Under Armour’s passion and commitment to high quality and innovation will benefit our student-athletes for years to come. Our entire department is looking forward to a long and mutually productive relationship with the Under Armour team.”

The new deal will pay the Badgers a total of $7 million in cash and product in 2015-16 and is valued at $96 million over the life of the contract, good for second in the Big Ten, trailing only Nike’s new contract with Michigan.

Hidden within the contract are two nuggets that UA offered to sway the Badgers away from Adidas, from the Portland Business Journal:

Wisconsin will get as much as $500,000 from Under Armour to “rebrand” athletic facilities. It’ll get $150,000 to build out an Under Armour retail space in a campus gift shop called Bucky’s Locker Room. It also gets two summer internships for students at Under Armour’s Baltimore headquarters.

“The University of Wisconsin is an institution built on the highest values of academic excellence, and we are extremely proud to be teaming up with one of the most vibrant, distinctive and successful athletic programs in the country to help elevate the performance of all Badgers with innovative footwear and apparel,” added Plank.

Wisconsin’s departure continues to weaken the stronghold Adidas had built in the Midwest after losing Michigan to Nike and Notre Dame to Under Armour in recent years (the company still owns apparel rights for Indiana and Nebraska). The Badgers are now the 41st Division I athletics department and 17th FBS program to join UA.