Skip to content

UConn ‘aggressively pursuing’ ACC membership


In a statement released shortly after it was confirmed Pittsburgh and Syracuse would be moving from the Big East to the ACC,  UConn president Susan Herbst said that while her school is “a proud charter member of the Big East… it is my responsibility as President that we stay in constant communication and be actively involved in discussions with our counterparts from around the country to ensure the successful long-term future of our university’s athletic program.”

Apparently, she wasn’t joking about the constant communication and staying actively involved in discussions with other conference officials.

According to, “Herbst is aggressively pursuing membership in the ACC to become the 15th or 16th member institution” of the conference.  Pittsburgh and Syracuse became the 13th and 14th members earlier today, although it remains unclear exactly when they officially join.

At a media teleconference conducted Sunday morning, commissioner John Swofford said that while his conference is comfortable with 14 members, it’s not philosophically opposed to moving to 16.  Such a stance would certainly leave the door open for additional expansion; hell, Maryland athletic director Kevin Anderson said in a statement today that his school is “look[ing] forward to discussions about the future of the league and would encourage a future expansion.”

As an aside, and as it pertains to UConn, the final paragraph of Herbst’s three-paragraph statement released Sunday morning deserves to be highlighted.

“To my mind, the conference realignments and incessant national gossip is distracting many presidents and athletic directors from the real conversations we should be having, about academics, the distorting role of money in sports and what it means to support student-athletes.  I hope all settles soon, and we can change the national focus away from profiteering and back to student-athletes, where it belongs.”

Hypocrite much, Ms. Herbst?  Apparently it’s fine to take the focus off academics and the distorting role of money in sports and shift it to expansion and profiteering in another conference when it benefits your institution.

People wonder why college sports, football in particular, are in the shape they’re in today?  Look no further than the leaders charged with decision-making.

Permalink 6 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: American Athletic Conference, Atlantic Coast Conference, Rumor Mill, Top Posts, UConn Huskies
6 Responses to “UConn ‘aggressively pursuing’ ACC membership”
  1. overratedgators says: Sep 18, 2011 4:52 PM

    Never thought I’d see a picture of “Two Face” in a CFT piece. My nerdy self bows to your nerdy self, JT.

  2. John Taylor says: Sep 18, 2011 4:57 PM

    Google image searches for “hypocrite” and “talking out of both sides of your mouth” produced no photos that fit the post.

  3. atl14dat says: Sep 18, 2011 6:40 PM

    Long Live Two face.

    The point is well made also.

  4. Fan On Fire_Maurice Barksdale says: Sep 18, 2011 7:59 PM

    I would tink that the Big 10 would be very interested in UConn as well, to get that Boston TV market.

    But it makes sense that UConn would want to stay with their former Big East members like Syracuse to save those rivalries.

  5. chr8848 says: Sep 19, 2011 1:26 PM

    With (4) 16 team super conferences. NCAA creates Playoff system without creating playoff system. Finds way to maintain bowls. Imagine a Texas/OU vs USC/Oregon Pac-16 Title with winner to face UF/Alabama vs LSU/Texas A&M winner for National Title. Every week is truly a playoff in this format.

  6. mhalt99 says: Sep 19, 2011 4:13 PM

    I hope all settles soon, and we can change the national focus away from profiteering and back to student-athletes, where it belongs.”

    Because the reality is, sports have the ability to generate a large amount of revenue for a university but the monies made from sports PALES in comparison to what we can make in our core business: Overcharging our students degrees that are worth nothing compared to twenty years ago, while arguing that we need to increase tuition yet again. We also need to continue to find new useless degrees to offer those who can not achieve the most basic proficiency in math, science or literature.

    It is important for us to have the largest possible endowment so we can………so we can….? look at it?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!