Skip to content

Big East TV dollars could fall well short of other conferences

Money AP

Surprise of the century, right?

It’s not much of a secret that the Big East faces uncertain times. In addition to the massive turnover, the league is facing its second lawsuit in the past year (courtesy of Pitt for the right to leave in 2013), and for a while, Boise State appeared on the fence about hopping over from the Mountain West.

At the center of the latter issue is the Big East’s TV deal, which is still to-be-announced after the conference reportedly turned down an offer last year that would have paid all-sports members roughly $14 million annually — BSU, a football-only member, would have received over $8 million annually — with the thought process at the time being the league could get more if it waited.

Turns out, that could be far from the truth.

Speaking with the San Diego Union Tribune, San Diego State president Elliot Hirschman said the “most conservative estimate” he’s heard for the Big East’s new TV deal is $6.4 million (not pictured) per school annually. For what it’s worth, CBSSports reported last week that the conference payout could be as low as $50 million per year before being divided among its members.

Negotiations for the deal are reportedly set to begin in September, and in fairness, $6.4 million — if that is indeed the number — is still far greater than the $1.2 million in TV revenue the Aztecs receive from the Mountain West.

“While there is variability in some of the estimates, all the estimates continue to indicate a substantially greater number than is associated with our current Mountain West television contract,” Hirshman said.

Still, if the numbers floating to the top of the rumor mill have any merit, you can be sure there will be more than a few Big East presidents wondering about what could have been.

Permalink 5 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: American Athletic Conference, Mountain West Conference, Rumor Mill, San Diego State Aztecs, Top Posts
5 Responses to “Big East TV dollars could fall well short of other conferences”
  1. thefiesty1 says: May 30, 2012 5:06 PM

    I’m surprised anyone would even consider televising Little East games. They can’t sell the commercials because so few viewers would care to watch. Division II or III schools have as many viewers. Get over it, either merge with the MAC or drop down a division.

  2. fatcamper says: May 30, 2012 5:36 PM

    You’re right they should pass up over 6 million a year and move back to DII. Good call there.

  3. mountaineer50415 says: May 30, 2012 7:53 PM

    Sounds odd that thefiesty1 has so much to say about the Big East. Surely you are not afraid that one of these schools will stomp on yours. Why are their problems so thrilling for you?
    Best of luck to every school in the Big East. May you continue to do better each year.

  4. fcmlefty1 says: May 30, 2012 9:31 PM

    all big east jokes aside, this is interesting. The money is clearly going to be less than the big 5 conferences (the ACC money isnt that bad really, so I’ll put them somewhat close to the other 4), but also is going to be clearly better than anything the small 5 (soon to be 4 – goodbye WAC) could ever dream about. Not quite sure what to make of it and would love to read some intellegent commentary on the subject as this comment thread progresses.

  5. Pac12Ute says: May 31, 2012 5:37 AM

    “Big East’s new TV deal is $6.4 million (not pictured)” I didn’t see that coming, but oh so funny!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!