Now we’ll hang half a hundred on Okie Lite.

Woot.

You say “you want to bet they are eligible to play before OU’s first major oponate? sic”
I’d say that it depends entirely on the players. Two of the three have been completely OFF scholarship and on their own for a few months; after that, if they have not learned how to act, and do anything else outside of what’s required of them, Bob will kick them the hell off the team. We now have enough good receivers, who have the right attitude, that the malcontents are not needed.

you have to admit returning these receivers two days after the guy who was supposed to fill in was declared ineligible is a little suspicious.

if they are deemed a negative influence on the team and continually get in trouble is it worth it to bring them back just to have a better shot at winning?

it’s deplorable to put winning over ethics.

and according to local OU insiders the three have done very little to earn their spot back. its more about OU needs them so they are going to strongly encourage them to “earn” their spot.

what do you want to bet they are eligible to play before OU’s first major oponate?

I just LOVE it when uneducated twits like you who know NOTHING about a school and it’s football program make stupid comments like that. We’ve got good guys in our program who make stupid decisions sometimes like a lot of people.

So grow up, educate yourself, and get your facts right before making irrational statements.

Making inane comments about the Coach and the subject players, when you don’t know ANYTHING about the nature of the infractions, is not only not smart, it does not constitute even a decent form of JackAssery. (But I’ll bet you are proficient at it!)