Well of course the convicted serial pedophile wants that.
As expected, convicted serial pedophile Jerry Sandusky has asked a judge to overturn the nearly four dozen counts of the molestation/sexual abuse/rape of 10 boys for which he was essentially sentenced to life in prison earlier this month.
In the filing, made in the Bellefonte (Pa.) courthouse where he was sentenced to a mandatory minimum of 30 years in prison, the convicted serial pedophile claimed his lawyers were not given sufficient time to prepare their defense on 50-plus original counts as well as the statute of limitations for some charges had expired.
In one of the more laughable claims in the 31-page motion, the convicted serial pedophile claims that “the court’s sentence was excessive and tantamount … to a life sentence, which the defendant submits is in violation of his rights.”
What rights — outside of due process, a speedy trial and a jury of his peers — a convicted serial pedophile feels he’s entitled to and was violated of is unclear.
Other issues the convicted serial pedophile has with the judicial process as it pertains to him?
More than a third of the document explores ways Sandusky believes the rapid pace of the case violated his right to due process of law, as he went from arrest to trial in just over seven months. His lawyers said they were swamped by documents from prosecutors, they lacked time to interview possible witnesses and an expert and two assistants were not available at trial.
The document said Judge John Cleland ruled improperly concerning the use of a computer-generated drawing of an accuser and issued incorrect jury instructions. It also raised issues about prosecutors’ closing argument, the vagueness of the charges, sequestration of jurors and the amount of restitution ordered.
OK, that’s exactly what you’d expect from an individual who has blamed everybody but himself for a situation that will result in him (rightly) never again sniffing the sweet smell of freedom.
This will likely be the last time you see the name “Sandusky” on this website, until, of course, this motion is denied and is followed by one in which the convicted serial pedophile claims ineffective/incompetent/negligent counsel.