<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predictions 101 &#8212; BCS championship game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/</link>
	<description>CollegeFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jericoc</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-120419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jericoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 06:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-120419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s how ND&#039;s regular-season opponents fared in games this bowl season:


Navy (&lt;b&gt;L&lt;/b&gt;) v. [NR] Arizona State, 62-28
Purdue (&lt;b&gt;L&lt;/b&gt;) v. [NR] Oklahomas State, 58-14
Michigan State (&lt;b&gt;W&lt;/b&gt;) v. [NR] TCU, 17-16
Michigan (&lt;b&gt;L&lt;/b&gt;) v. [10] South Carolina, 33-28
Miami (FL)*
Stanford (&lt;b&gt;W&lt;/b&gt;) v. [NR] Wisconsin, 20-14
BYU (&lt;b&gt;W&lt;/b&gt;) v. [NR] San Diego State, 23-6
Oklahoma (&lt;b&gt;L&lt;/b&gt;) v. [9] Texas A&amp;M, 41-13
Pittsburgh (&lt;b&gt;L&lt;/b&gt;) v. [NR] Ole Miss, 38-17
Boston College*
Wake Forest*
USC (&lt;b&gt;L&lt;/b&gt;) v. [NR] Georgia Tech, 21-7


* Did not play in a bowl game]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s how ND&#8217;s regular-season opponents fared in games this bowl season:</p>
<p>Navy (<b>L</b>) v. [NR] Arizona State, 62-28<br />
Purdue (<b>L</b>) v. [NR] Oklahomas State, 58-14<br />
Michigan State (<b>W</b>) v. [NR] TCU, 17-16<br />
Michigan (<b>L</b>) v. [10] South Carolina, 33-28<br />
Miami (FL)*<br />
Stanford (<b>W</b>) v. [NR] Wisconsin, 20-14<br />
BYU (<b>W</b>) v. [NR] San Diego State, 23-6<br />
Oklahoma (<b>L</b>) v. [9] Texas A&amp;M, 41-13<br />
Pittsburgh (<b>L</b>) v. [NR] Ole Miss, 38-17<br />
Boston College*<br />
Wake Forest*<br />
USC (<b>L</b>) v. [NR] Georgia Tech, 21-7</p>
<p>* Did not play in a bowl game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chillyphil73</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-117621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chillyphil73]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-117621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@nd72mgr

If you&#039;re going to say that the records of the SEC teams that &#039;Bama didn&#039;t play doesn&#039;t matter, then how are you goging to turn right around and bring up total win/loss records of all the opponents that each team played? That doesn&#039;t really make sense to me, or I just clearly missed your point. The six highest rated SEC teams each only lossed one or two games to OTHER SEC schools. The teams in the conference clearly each dished out and received punishment at some point within the conference. That speaks to the strength of the SEC. Usually, the top half of the confernce are each ranked and they all are tough to beat on the road and sometimes at your own stadium too. Every year for the last decade at least, week in and week out, the SEC keeps from five to as many as nine teams ranked at any given time. You can&#039;t say this about any other conference, period. Who cares who Navy, Pitt, or BYU beat/played? Also ND played three games each against both the ACC and the (Little)Big Ten, so that&#039;s basically substitutes for them not being in a conference. I would hardly match that schedule to &#039;Bama&#039;s. Yes, I said it before and I&#039;ll say it again, &quot;ND is going to LOSE!&quot; I stand behind that, wholeheartedly even more now. If you believe that strongly otherwise and aren&#039;t just hoping for your favorite school/alma matter to win, then put your money where your mouth is! I went to the Univ. of Arkansas, by the way, and I&#039;m not a &#039;Bama fan. However, I do support the SEC and I have common sense enough to call &#039;em like I see &#039;em. Evidently, the odds makers do to because &#039;Bama is anywhere from 9 1/2 to 10 point favorite to win. Your call, sport!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nd72mgr</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to say that the records of the SEC teams that &#8216;Bama didn&#8217;t play doesn&#8217;t matter, then how are you goging to turn right around and bring up total win/loss records of all the opponents that each team played? That doesn&#8217;t really make sense to me, or I just clearly missed your point. The six highest rated SEC teams each only lossed one or two games to OTHER SEC schools. The teams in the conference clearly each dished out and received punishment at some point within the conference. That speaks to the strength of the SEC. Usually, the top half of the confernce are each ranked and they all are tough to beat on the road and sometimes at your own stadium too. Every year for the last decade at least, week in and week out, the SEC keeps from five to as many as nine teams ranked at any given time. You can&#8217;t say this about any other conference, period. Who cares who Navy, Pitt, or BYU beat/played? Also ND played three games each against both the ACC and the (Little)Big Ten, so that&#8217;s basically substitutes for them not being in a conference. I would hardly match that schedule to &#8216;Bama&#8217;s. Yes, I said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again, &#8220;ND is going to LOSE!&#8221; I stand behind that, wholeheartedly even more now. If you believe that strongly otherwise and aren&#8217;t just hoping for your favorite school/alma matter to win, then put your money where your mouth is! I went to the Univ. of Arkansas, by the way, and I&#8217;m not a &#8216;Bama fan. However, I do support the SEC and I have common sense enough to call &#8216;em like I see &#8216;em. Evidently, the odds makers do to because &#8216;Bama is anywhere from 9 1/2 to 10 point favorite to win. Your call, sport!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nd72mgr</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nd72mgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@chillyphil73

Please get your facts straight. From an earlier post of mine:

According to the NCAA, ND opponents were 81 and 62 (19 games over .500). Seven (Navy, MI, Miami, Standford, BYU, Oklahoma, and SC) had winning records. Three (Purdue, Mich. St., Pittsburgh) had .500 records, only two, WF and BC, had losing records (combined 7 &amp; 17). ND defeated 2 teams (OK and Stanford) which finished 10 &amp; 2.

Alabama also won 12 games, but did lose one to a good 10 &amp; 2 team, Texas A&amp;M. Their opponents&#039; record was 79 and 77 (and that would have been 68 and 75 without the SEC title game). Five of their opponents had winning records (W. Ky, Miss. St., LSU, T A&amp;M, and Georgia). Only two finished at .500 (Mich. and Ole Miss). The rest were a combined 21 and 50. Which is the same losing percentage as ND&#039;s losing record opponents.

Yes, &quot;Bama did play 3 teams which finished the year in the top 10 (not sure what relevance SEC teams finishing in the top 10 have when one does not actually play them). They defeated two and lost to one and the two wins were close victories that could have gone the other way. (as were several of ND&#039;s early in the year)

In their 3 games against teams in the top 12 (final rankings) &#039;Bama was 2 and 1 and scored 73 points and allowed 74. In ND&#039;s two top 12 games they scored 50 points and allowed only 26.

ND has the best scoring defense and &#039;Bama the best overal defense (about 33 ypg differential). ND has allowed -28 yards on running plays in the red zone and allowed just 2 rushing TD&#039;s in twelve games and the fewest number of TD&#039;s in the nation.

&#039;Bama has struggled on defense with mobile quarterbacks with good arms (LSU, TA&amp;M &amp; Georgia). ND&#039;s QB has improved every game and certainly has both the arm and the legs to frustrate defenses. ND has the Mackey Award TE and will likely have a very speedy WR back by the bowl game.

&#039;Bama ran for an average of 224 ypg, ND 202. &#039;Bama averaged 439 ypg on offense, ND 421.

So yes, I don&#039;t know who will win and neither do you. You are 100% confident that &#039;Bama will win, right now I am about 50/50 that ND will pull the upset (#1 beating #2 is an upset? weird). But please don&#039;t scream at people who think ND has a chance, the facts don&#039;t bear you out. And its freakin&#039; impolite.

I apologise for the long post. Oh, one more thing ND has Manti and you don&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chillyphil73</p>
<p>Please get your facts straight. From an earlier post of mine:</p>
<p>According to the NCAA, ND opponents were 81 and 62 (19 games over .500). Seven (Navy, MI, Miami, Standford, BYU, Oklahoma, and SC) had winning records. Three (Purdue, Mich. St., Pittsburgh) had .500 records, only two, WF and BC, had losing records (combined 7 &amp; 17). ND defeated 2 teams (OK and Stanford) which finished 10 &amp; 2.</p>
<p>Alabama also won 12 games, but did lose one to a good 10 &amp; 2 team, Texas A&amp;M. Their opponents&#8217; record was 79 and 77 (and that would have been 68 and 75 without the SEC title game). Five of their opponents had winning records (W. Ky, Miss. St., LSU, T A&amp;M, and Georgia). Only two finished at .500 (Mich. and Ole Miss). The rest were a combined 21 and 50. Which is the same losing percentage as ND&#8217;s losing record opponents.</p>
<p>Yes, &#8220;Bama did play 3 teams which finished the year in the top 10 (not sure what relevance SEC teams finishing in the top 10 have when one does not actually play them). They defeated two and lost to one and the two wins were close victories that could have gone the other way. (as were several of ND&#8217;s early in the year)</p>
<p>In their 3 games against teams in the top 12 (final rankings) &#8216;Bama was 2 and 1 and scored 73 points and allowed 74. In ND&#8217;s two top 12 games they scored 50 points and allowed only 26.</p>
<p>ND has the best scoring defense and &#8216;Bama the best overal defense (about 33 ypg differential). ND has allowed -28 yards on running plays in the red zone and allowed just 2 rushing TD&#8217;s in twelve games and the fewest number of TD&#8217;s in the nation.</p>
<p>&#8216;Bama has struggled on defense with mobile quarterbacks with good arms (LSU, TA&amp;M &amp; Georgia). ND&#8217;s QB has improved every game and certainly has both the arm and the legs to frustrate defenses. ND has the Mackey Award TE and will likely have a very speedy WR back by the bowl game.</p>
<p>&#8216;Bama ran for an average of 224 ypg, ND 202. &#8216;Bama averaged 439 ypg on offense, ND 421.</p>
<p>So yes, I don&#8217;t know who will win and neither do you. You are 100% confident that &#8216;Bama will win, right now I am about 50/50 that ND will pull the upset (#1 beating #2 is an upset? weird). But please don&#8217;t scream at people who think ND has a chance, the facts don&#8217;t bear you out. And its freakin&#8217; impolite.</p>
<p>I apologise for the long post. Oh, one more thing ND has Manti and you don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamafan36</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bamafan36]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@nickynick04

Dude.....what the eff does graduation rate, as it relates to student athletes, have to do with ANYTHING? Are you so simple, to not realize that a young man that leaves school in his sophomore year to go to the NBA, his freshman year to go to the MLB, or his junior year to go to the NFL, are what accounts for the lowered graduation rates? You are talking like these kids that go to SEC Schools, are so stupid, that the can&#039;t graduate. Bama has a center who won the Heisman of Academics, this year. Barrett Jones has been an Academic All-American since 2009. Greg McElroy was up for a Rhodes Scholarship. and, he is currently in the NFL (and I could argue that he should be starting, over Mark Sanchez).

Let&#039;s assume, for a moment, that the kids at Alabama are too stupid to graduate.....Now, how will this affect the predictions in this article? Exactly! It won&#039;t! Kindly stick to facts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nickynick04</p>
<p>Dude&#8230;..what the eff does graduation rate, as it relates to student athletes, have to do with ANYTHING? Are you so simple, to not realize that a young man that leaves school in his sophomore year to go to the NBA, his freshman year to go to the MLB, or his junior year to go to the NFL, are what accounts for the lowered graduation rates? You are talking like these kids that go to SEC Schools, are so stupid, that the can&#8217;t graduate. Bama has a center who won the Heisman of Academics, this year. Barrett Jones has been an Academic All-American since 2009. Greg McElroy was up for a Rhodes Scholarship. and, he is currently in the NFL (and I could argue that he should be starting, over Mark Sanchez).</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume, for a moment, that the kids at Alabama are too stupid to graduate&#8230;..Now, how will this affect the predictions in this article? Exactly! It won&#8217;t! Kindly stick to facts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickynick04</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickynick04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a South Carolina and a SEC fan,,,BUT my point is these graduation rates are embarrassing.
We need to address this issue before the NCAA does]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a South Carolina and a SEC fan,,,BUT my point is these graduation rates are embarrassing.<br />
We need to address this issue before the NCAA does</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normtide</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[normtide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 01:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even after your rant, the SEC will still beat you on the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even after your rant, the SEC will still beat you on the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickynick04</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickynick04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 01:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok SEC FANS   lets discuss a few things...number 1
The &quot; Sorry Educational Conference &quot;  Yes,,,look at the football graduation rates,,,they are a disgrace...and you wonder why people all over the country snicker at the SEC....
They are not Schools of higher learning for athletes.
Any team with a lower then 70% football graduation rate,,,or any sport for that matter should be banned from Conference title games and BCS Bowl games or ANY Bowl games...Guys this is COLLEGE FOOTBALL. Where you go to learn. 
Football is a sport sponsered by a school of higher learning...
I do not believe a school who is proud and works hard in academics should have to play schools who do not care about education....
We need to remember what colleges are for,,,they are schools/institutions of higher learning...how many SEC schools have a 70% graduation rate....and 70% sucks !   it should be high 80 s 90 s
Example  South carolina s football graduation rate in 2011 was 57%...they should be a shame of themselves...so SEC fans,,,check your scholl s graduation rate before you compare them to a team that has to study, go to school and PASS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok SEC FANS   lets discuss a few things&#8230;number 1<br />
The &#8221; Sorry Educational Conference &#8221;  Yes,,,look at the football graduation rates,,,they are a disgrace&#8230;and you wonder why people all over the country snicker at the SEC&#8230;.<br />
They are not Schools of higher learning for athletes.<br />
Any team with a lower then 70% football graduation rate,,,or any sport for that matter should be banned from Conference title games and BCS Bowl games or ANY Bowl games&#8230;Guys this is COLLEGE FOOTBALL. Where you go to learn.<br />
Football is a sport sponsered by a school of higher learning&#8230;<br />
I do not believe a school who is proud and works hard in academics should have to play schools who do not care about education&#8230;.<br />
We need to remember what colleges are for,,,they are schools/institutions of higher learning&#8230;how many SEC schools have a 70% graduation rate&#8230;.and 70% sucks !   it should be high 80 s 90 s<br />
Example  South carolina s football graduation rate in 2011 was 57%&#8230;they should be a shame of themselves&#8230;so SEC fans,,,check your scholl s graduation rate before you compare them to a team that has to study, go to school and PASS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigersgeaux</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tigersgeaux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[foreverlsu:

I had heard rumors of Lizzy&#039;s situation and I know some Irish posters on previous CFT blogs about this time last year assassinated Lizzy&#039;s character (acting as agents of the Dome, I guess).  My mother went to St. Mary&#039;s, and my aunt also, then to Notre Dame when they finally began accepting women.  I am printing the article and bringing it to them.  Thank you again.

Please stay on here and keep posting.  We need you on these blogs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>foreverlsu:</p>
<p>I had heard rumors of Lizzy&#8217;s situation and I know some Irish posters on previous CFT blogs about this time last year assassinated Lizzy&#8217;s character (acting as agents of the Dome, I guess).  My mother went to St. Mary&#8217;s, and my aunt also, then to Notre Dame when they finally began accepting women.  I am printing the article and bringing it to them.  Thank you again.</p>
<p>Please stay on here and keep posting.  We need you on these blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foreverlsu</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foreverlsu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why I Won&#039;t be Cheering for Old Notre Dame

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2012/12/04/why-i-wont-be-cheering-for-old-notre-dame/?hpid=z4]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why I Won&#8217;t be Cheering for Old Notre Dame</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2012/12/04/why-i-wont-be-cheering-for-old-notre-dame/?hpid=z4" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2012/12/04/why-i-wont-be-cheering-for-old-notre-dame/?hpid=z4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtizzo</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gtizzo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The analysis done is this article was relevant in August...not in January.  First Cooper is a nice receiver but he is pocket change to Lee, Woods and Stills.  I wouldn&#039;t be so quick with the &quot;ask Georgia&quot; line either.  Georgia gave up 350 yards on the ground and only lost by 4 points.  With a timeout or more time on the clock (maybe better play calling) Georgia may have won.  Everything in this article was known in the preseason and this crap passes for analysis.  First fire the writer for an article that my 8 year old could right.  Second the Irish have were underdogs to Oklahoma, Michigan State and USC.  The worst thing to do is count out ND just as Mark May.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The analysis done is this article was relevant in August&#8230;not in January.  First Cooper is a nice receiver but he is pocket change to Lee, Woods and Stills.  I wouldn&#8217;t be so quick with the &#8220;ask Georgia&#8221; line either.  Georgia gave up 350 yards on the ground and only lost by 4 points.  With a timeout or more time on the clock (maybe better play calling) Georgia may have won.  Everything in this article was known in the preseason and this crap passes for analysis.  First fire the writer for an article that my 8 year old could right.  Second the Irish have were underdogs to Oklahoma, Michigan State and USC.  The worst thing to do is count out ND just as Mark May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: draconian1111</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[draconian1111]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 07:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3 titles in 4 years?
Nebraska
94, 95, and split with Michigan in 97 (Michigan beat #8 WSU 21-16 in Rose Bowl, while Nebraska crushed Peyton Manning and the #3 Vols 42-17 in the Orange Bowl)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 titles in 4 years?<br />
Nebraska<br />
94, 95, and split with Michigan in 97 (Michigan beat #8 WSU 21-16 in Rose Bowl, while Nebraska crushed Peyton Manning and the #3 Vols 42-17 in the Orange Bowl)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chillyphil73</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chillyphil73]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait just a minute, nd72mgr.

nd72mgr says:
Dec 3, 2012 4:20pm

Folks, no one knows who&#039;s going to win this game......

_____________________________________
Give me a break please, will ya? Look at the number of teams that the SEC ended the year with in the Top 10! Six, count &#039;em ,six teams: Bama, Florida, LSU, UGA, So Carolina, &amp; Texas A&amp;M. How many schools that ND played were in the Top 10? Just one! Stanford. Also Miss St., Vandy, and Ole Miss were ranked in the Top 25. You singled out OU for ND&#039;s highest ranked win, but three other teams beat them too and by a higher margin at that. Does  that make them better than ND? You forgot that Bama played LSU when they were still in the #5 and UGA at #3, also Miss St was #13, Michigan at #8 and Texas A&amp;M at #15. That&#039;s five opponents in the Top 15 when they played them on the field. ND play Mich St. at #10, Mich at #18, Stanford at #17, and OU at #8. The reason that  Mich was so low when ND played them is that Bama had just whipped that tail 41-14 in which the score could&#039;ve been much worse but for Saban calling off the dogs, so to speak. ND played them three weeks later and only won 13-6! It really isn&#039;t close as far as who is really battle tested, now is it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait just a minute, nd72mgr.</p>
<p>nd72mgr says:<br />
Dec 3, 2012 4:20pm</p>
<p>Folks, no one knows who&#8217;s going to win this game&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>_____________________________________<br />
Give me a break please, will ya? Look at the number of teams that the SEC ended the year with in the Top 10! Six, count &#8216;em ,six teams: Bama, Florida, LSU, UGA, So Carolina, &amp; Texas A&amp;M. How many schools that ND played were in the Top 10? Just one! Stanford. Also Miss St., Vandy, and Ole Miss were ranked in the Top 25. You singled out OU for ND&#8217;s highest ranked win, but three other teams beat them too and by a higher margin at that. Does  that make them better than ND? You forgot that Bama played LSU when they were still in the #5 and UGA at #3, also Miss St was #13, Michigan at #8 and Texas A&amp;M at #15. That&#8217;s five opponents in the Top 15 when they played them on the field. ND play Mich St. at #10, Mich at #18, Stanford at #17, and OU at #8. The reason that  Mich was so low when ND played them is that Bama had just whipped that tail 41-14 in which the score could&#8217;ve been much worse but for Saban calling off the dogs, so to speak. ND played them three weeks later and only won 13-6! It really isn&#8217;t close as far as who is really battle tested, now is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucrightoff</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bucrightoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how Notre Dame&#039;s defense is going to get fatigued, what with the 0 games in 50 days they&#039;ll be playing leading up to it. Their brains might be sore because unlike SEC schools they actually go to class and excel. But fatigue will not be a factor. 

Notre Dame will win for one reason: desire. They will want to win it so much worse than Alabama, who&#039;s team is full of guys who won last year, or young guys who will have multiple chances to win again. For Notre Dame, a lot of their seniors (Manti being the biggest of course) will want this worse than anything. 

Notre Dame 27
Alabama 17]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how Notre Dame&#8217;s defense is going to get fatigued, what with the 0 games in 50 days they&#8217;ll be playing leading up to it. Their brains might be sore because unlike SEC schools they actually go to class and excel. But fatigue will not be a factor. </p>
<p>Notre Dame will win for one reason: desire. They will want to win it so much worse than Alabama, who&#8217;s team is full of guys who won last year, or young guys who will have multiple chances to win again. For Notre Dame, a lot of their seniors (Manti being the biggest of course) will want this worse than anything. </p>
<p>Notre Dame 27<br />
Alabama 17</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cometkazie</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-116014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cometkazie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-116014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[alligatorsnapper says:
Dec 5, 2012 12:56 PM
+=+=+

The next game was played at LSU’s home field on a Saturday night 1971. The Irish were not on the same field. Final score 28-8, but that does not reveal the complete domination of LSU on both sides of the ball, and the huge butt-whipping the Irish took.
+=+=+
I witnessed the very game from the South End Zone.  Always capitalized, BTW.

Andy Hamilton was 10y behind the ND secondary, in front of the visitors&#039; bench, and everybody in the stadium held their collective breaths while the ball was in the air.  

Thanks for the memory . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alligatorsnapper says:<br />
Dec 5, 2012 12:56 PM<br />
+=+=+</p>
<p>The next game was played at LSU’s home field on a Saturday night 1971. The Irish were not on the same field. Final score 28-8, but that does not reveal the complete domination of LSU on both sides of the ball, and the huge butt-whipping the Irish took.<br />
+=+=+<br />
I witnessed the very game from the South End Zone.  Always capitalized, BTW.</p>
<p>Andy Hamilton was 10y behind the ND secondary, in front of the visitors&#8217; bench, and everybody in the stadium held their collective breaths while the ball was in the air.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the memory . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alligatorsnapper</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alligatorsnapper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1historian:

Lane Kiffen&#039;s calls on the goal line series was beyond pitiful!  Classic Kiffen.

This following info from southernpatriots, editing by me...

In the early 70s, LSU played Notre Dame in South Bend amidst blowing sheets of frozen rain and very frigid temps.  Portions of the game could not be viewed by fans in the stands due to white outs.  Through referee shanangans, the local Irish won the game 3-0. A Chicago Tribune writer to pen, &quot;If Notre Dame is number one, LSU has got to be one-A.&quot;

The next game was played at LSU&#039;s home field on a Saturday night 1971.   The Irish were not on the same field.  Final score 28-8, but that does not reveal the complete domination of LSU on both sides of the ball, and the huge butt-whipping the Irish took.  

Ara Parsegian said after that huge butt-whipping at Death Valley that he would never return to LSU to play another game...and he didn&#039;t.  The series resumed some years later after he was gone and now stands 5-5.

Alabama has won 1 game in 5 with Notre Dame.

All that is history, historian1, not that it is determinative over the upcoming game.  

Most Louisianans have friends and relatives with Notre Dame lineages (nephews, cousins, etc.) and of course LSU.  I am LSU and SEC so I am for the SEC champion.  Though I at least approach the &quot;hate Alabama&quot; group, I am not quite there, because I don&#039;t hate too many things.  Alabama is our rival and we are roughly about 50 percent with them the past few years, but I hope they win out and bring another one to the SEC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1historian:</p>
<p>Lane Kiffen&#8217;s calls on the goal line series was beyond pitiful!  Classic Kiffen.</p>
<p>This following info from southernpatriots, editing by me&#8230;</p>
<p>In the early 70s, LSU played Notre Dame in South Bend amidst blowing sheets of frozen rain and very frigid temps.  Portions of the game could not be viewed by fans in the stands due to white outs.  Through referee shanangans, the local Irish won the game 3-0. A Chicago Tribune writer to pen, &#8220;If Notre Dame is number one, LSU has got to be one-A.&#8221;</p>
<p>The next game was played at LSU&#8217;s home field on a Saturday night 1971.   The Irish were not on the same field.  Final score 28-8, but that does not reveal the complete domination of LSU on both sides of the ball, and the huge butt-whipping the Irish took.  </p>
<p>Ara Parsegian said after that huge butt-whipping at Death Valley that he would never return to LSU to play another game&#8230;and he didn&#8217;t.  The series resumed some years later after he was gone and now stands 5-5.</p>
<p>Alabama has won 1 game in 5 with Notre Dame.</p>
<p>All that is history, historian1, not that it is determinative over the upcoming game.  </p>
<p>Most Louisianans have friends and relatives with Notre Dame lineages (nephews, cousins, etc.) and of course LSU.  I am LSU and SEC so I am for the SEC champion.  Though I at least approach the &#8220;hate Alabama&#8221; group, I am not quite there, because I don&#8217;t hate too many things.  Alabama is our rival and we are roughly about 50 percent with them the past few years, but I hope they win out and bring another one to the SEC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normtide</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[normtide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously I went to school longer then the auto spell on my phone did.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously I went to school longer then the auto spell on my phone did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1historian</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1historian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[normtide: your 4:12 - &quot;southern people stick together, how completed is that?&quot; 

How far did you go in school, big guy? Sorry to take such an obvious shot at you, but you must admit that you DID ask for it. 

The game? Alabama will be favored as they should be, but ND has won a lot of close games, and I don&#039;t think they have played their best yet either on O or on D. 

&#039;Bama was very impressive against Georgia - they stayed calm after the blocked field goal  and then just flat out took over the game, just when Georgia was feeling frisky. Georgia came back and could have won but - they didn&#039;t. 

Gonna be a good game
ND&#039;s goal line stand against USC was pretty impressive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>normtide: your 4:12 &#8211; &#8220;southern people stick together, how completed is that?&#8221; </p>
<p>How far did you go in school, big guy? Sorry to take such an obvious shot at you, but you must admit that you DID ask for it. </p>
<p>The game? Alabama will be favored as they should be, but ND has won a lot of close games, and I don&#8217;t think they have played their best yet either on O or on D. </p>
<p>&#8216;Bama was very impressive against Georgia &#8211; they stayed calm after the blocked field goal  and then just flat out took over the game, just when Georgia was feeling frisky. Georgia came back and could have won but &#8211; they didn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Gonna be a good game<br />
ND&#8217;s goal line stand against USC was pretty impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamafan36</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bamafan36]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to explain it for you simpleton&#039;s...ONE LAST TIME: When your team beats mine, and then loses to another, it makes my loss and team look worse. Like it, or not, that is just how we see it!

As for the prediction:
Alabama Cimson Tide - 54
Nuetered Dames Irish Child Molestor&#039;s - 9]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to explain it for you simpleton&#8217;s&#8230;ONE LAST TIME: When your team beats mine, and then loses to another, it makes my loss and team look worse. Like it, or not, that is just how we see it!</p>
<p>As for the prediction:<br />
Alabama Cimson Tide &#8211; 54<br />
Nuetered Dames Irish Child Molestor&#8217;s &#8211; 9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normtide</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[normtide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post Dublin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Dublin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ljdublin</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ljdublin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to ND but appreciate SEC football.  It will be a good game for all the fans.  I live in the South yet cheer for Notre Dame.  Nothing better than a good college football game between 2 epic programs.  Just appreciate that we have the opportunity to see it, no matter who wins, it will be a classic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to ND but appreciate SEC football.  It will be a good game for all the fans.  I live in the South yet cheer for Notre Dame.  Nothing better than a good college football game between 2 epic programs.  Just appreciate that we have the opportunity to see it, no matter who wins, it will be a classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ljdublin</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ljdublin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ROLL IRISH!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROLL IRISH!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrpigs</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrpigs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr Pigs behaves for no one!!! Troll tide troll! Smoochiessssss]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Pigs behaves for no one!!! Troll tide troll! Smoochiessssss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normtide</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[normtide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 04:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All in good fun, comet. I have tremendous respect for ND.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in good fun, comet. I have tremendous respect for ND.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cometkazie</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cometkazie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 04:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Norm, you and Pigs behave y&#039;all&#039;s selves.

ROTFLMAO!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm, you and Pigs behave y&#8217;all&#8217;s selves.</p>
<p>ROTFLMAO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normtide</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[normtide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pigs- keep this up and someone will mention priestly activities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pigs- keep this up and someone will mention priestly activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrpigs</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrpigs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catholics v Cousins! The whole SEC roots for each other because there all freakishly related! Troll tide troll! Smoochies!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catholics v Cousins! The whole SEC roots for each other because there all freakishly related! Troll tide troll! Smoochies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent point, normtide!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point, normtide!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normtide</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[normtide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post Deb. You hadn&#039;t to remember too, early on in college football southern teams were left out of bowls. Southern football was black balled. When Bama was finally allowed to play, they beat Washington in the rose bowl. On the train ride back, the players were greeted by fans at every whistle stop in the south. We stick together because everyone else stands against us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Deb. You hadn&#8217;t to remember too, early on in college football southern teams were left out of bowls. Southern football was black balled. When Bama was finally allowed to play, they beat Washington in the rose bowl. On the train ride back, the players were greeted by fans at every whistle stop in the south. We stick together because everyone else stands against us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@grattanstanford ...

I&#039;m rare among Southerners in that I probably love the NFL even more than the college game. And much as I respect the Ravens, I won&#039;t be rooting for them if my Steelers are eliminated ahead of them this year. I still get warm fuzzies thinking about Billy Cundiff missing that FG against the Pats last season. But pro sports is a different animal. NASCAR is a mystery to me as well, although I once sat through a Dale Earnhart biopic trying to figure it out. This region was not only the birthplace of country music, but of gospel, R&amp;B, rock &#039;n&#039; roll, and bluegrass. We&#039;ve given a lot of music to the world ... plus a lot of literature and many statesmen. 

The bottom line is that college football was the only game in this part of the country for many, many years. And during decades of poverty and despair, it was a source of regional pride. That heritage has been handed down through generations ... the fierce competition among our teams and the us-against-them attitude toward outsiders. As I&#039;ve said before, it&#039;s both historic and socioeconomic. Wise people learn from other cultures. As normtide said, it&#039;s pitiful to simply hate what you don&#039;t understand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@grattanstanford &#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m rare among Southerners in that I probably love the NFL even more than the college game. And much as I respect the Ravens, I won&#8217;t be rooting for them if my Steelers are eliminated ahead of them this year. I still get warm fuzzies thinking about Billy Cundiff missing that FG against the Pats last season. But pro sports is a different animal. NASCAR is a mystery to me as well, although I once sat through a Dale Earnhart biopic trying to figure it out. This region was not only the birthplace of country music, but of gospel, R&amp;B, rock &#8216;n&#8217; roll, and bluegrass. We&#8217;ve given a lot of music to the world &#8230; plus a lot of literature and many statesmen. </p>
<p>The bottom line is that college football was the only game in this part of the country for many, many years. And during decades of poverty and despair, it was a source of regional pride. That heritage has been handed down through generations &#8230; the fierce competition among our teams and the us-against-them attitude toward outsiders. As I&#8217;ve said before, it&#8217;s both historic and socioeconomic. Wise people learn from other cultures. As normtide said, it&#8217;s pitiful to simply hate what you don&#8217;t understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normtide</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/03/predictions-101-bcs-championship/#comment-115307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[normtide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=201333#comment-115307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SP- its the truth. The put those stats up against teams that don&#039;t play D. Stanford held them to 14 points, in 4 quarters plus OT. Chip Kelly&#039;s presser after the LSU game sticks out in my mind. He was almost in tears. Saying he don&#039;t see athletes on defense like that out west.

To those who question why and how we root for teams. Why do you care what we do in the South? Obviously we are doing something right. We have a chance got SEVEN straight titles. I don&#039;t think we are going to change a thing, especially since out makes y&#039;all so mad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SP- its the truth. The put those stats up against teams that don&#8217;t play D. Stanford held them to 14 points, in 4 quarters plus OT. Chip Kelly&#8217;s presser after the LSU game sticks out in my mind. He was almost in tears. Saying he don&#8217;t see athletes on defense like that out west.</p>
<p>To those who question why and how we root for teams. Why do you care what we do in the South? Obviously we are doing something right. We have a chance got SEVEN straight titles. I don&#8217;t think we are going to change a thing, especially since out makes y&#8217;all so mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
