Greg McGarity

Schools don’t want Clemson-Georgia moved to Labor Day


A bit of a stir was created Monday when Dan Wolken of USA Today tweeted that “Dabo Swinney told me the Clemson-Georgia game to open next season could end up on Monday night.”

The 2013 season opener for both schools is currently scheduled for the Saturday before Labor Day and, if the two athletic directors involved have any say in the matter, that’s where it will remain.

UGA’s AD Greg McGarity downplayed, to the point of scoffing, the notion of moving the game ahead on the calendar, telling the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that’s not even a subject that’s been broached — and it’s a subject he wouldn’t entertain even if it was.

That’s not an option, even if it was an option,” McGarity said. “There’s been no discussion about that at all.”

McGarity’s CU counterpart, Dan Radakovich, was not nearly as strident, but was in near lockstep just the same.

“This is a game that we want to have on Saturday,” Radakovich told “It’s a great game. It’ll be great for Clemson. It’ll be great for the University of Georgia. It’ll be a wonderful atmosphere for college football. That’s where we’d really like to keep it.”

It makes sense that both schools, particularly Georgia, would not want the game moved ahead on the schedule.  While Clemson plays host to South Carolina State the following Saturday, Georgia plays host to South Carolina in the conference opener for both teams.  There’s simply no way that the Bulldogs would willingly go into that key SEC East clash on a short week.

Now, could a network twist some arms to get the game moved to Labor Day in front of a primetime television audience?  Certainly it appears they could try — and maybe even have/will try — but, barring a shift in stance, it appears such a request would fall on deaf ears.

There’s also the possibility the game could be moved to an earlier date, say the Thursday or Friday before the scheduled Saturday, Sept. 1, opener.

“I think that would make much more sense,” McGarity told the Journal-Constitution.

Appalachian State announces five-year extension for head coach Scott Satterfield

Scott Satterfield
Associated Press
1 Comment

One day after it was revealed its head coach was the second-lowest paid in college football, Appalachian State announced a five-year contract extension for head coach Scott Satterfield.

“We have the right coach leading our football program in Scott Satterfield,” Appalachian State AD Doug Gillin said in a statement. “In nearly three years as head coach, he has stayed true to his convictions, built the program the right way and set Appalachian State football up for sustainable success both in the Sun Belt Conference and at the national level.”

Satterfield had earned $375,000 annually, ahead of only Louisiana-Monroe’s Todd Berry at $360,000 a year.

Satterfield, 42, is 14-14 in his third season at the Boone, N.C., school. He led the Mountaineers to a 7-5 mark in their debut Sun Belt season, and has the club at 3-1 to start the 2015 campaign.

“It’s exciting for my family and me to know that we’re going to be at Appalachian for the foreseeable future,” Satterfield added. “I’m living a dream by being the head coach at my alma mater and can’t wait to continue to work hard to help this program reach heights that it has never reached before.”

Wisconsin announces 10-year agreement with Under Armour

Joel Stave
Associated Press

What has long been rumored became fact Friday, as Wisconsin announced a 10-year agreement with Under Armour.

“I am absolutely thrilled about our new partnership with Under Armour,” AD Barry Alvarez said in a statement. “Kevin Plank and his team have established a brand that fits perfectly with the Wisconsin athletics story and culture. Our primary focus at Wisconsin is, of course, our student-athletes, and Under Armour’s passion and commitment to high quality and innovation will benefit our student-athletes for years to come. Our entire department is looking forward to a long and mutually productive relationship with the Under Armour team.”

The new deal will pay the Badgers a total of $7 million in cash and product in 2015-16 and is valued at $96 million over the life of the contract, good for second in the Big Ten, trailing only Nike’s new contract with Michigan.

Hidden within the contract are two nuggets that UA offered to sway the Badgers away from Adidas, from the Portland Business Journal:

Wisconsin will get as much as $500,000 from Under Armour to “rebrand” athletic facilities. It’ll get $150,000 to build out an Under Armour retail space in a campus gift shop called Bucky’s Locker Room. It also gets two summer internships for students at Under Armour’s Baltimore headquarters.

“The University of Wisconsin is an institution built on the highest values of academic excellence, and we are extremely proud to be teaming up with one of the most vibrant, distinctive and successful athletic programs in the country to help elevate the performance of all Badgers with innovative footwear and apparel,” added Plank.

Wisconsin’s departure continues to weaken the stronghold Adidas had built in the Midwest after losing Michigan to Nike and Notre Dame to Under Armour in recent years (the company still owns apparel rights for Indiana and Nebraska). The Badgers are now the 41st Division I athletics department and 17th FBS program to join UA.