Northern Iowa Iowa Football

Greg Garmon to try and shake AIRBHG at the JUCO level


Over the past several years, a malevolent deity has assailed the running back position at Iowa through either injury, arrest, transfer, locusts or some other biblical plague and/or pestilence.

Greg Garmon was one of those caught up in AIRBHG’s clutches, leaving the Hawkeyes back in mid-December because, simply, “it wasn’t clicking for him.”  A little over a month later, Garmon is looking to restart his playing career at a level that’s far from AIRBHG’s crosshairs — he hopes.

Butte (Calif.) College coach Jeff Jordan confirmed to that Garmon “started school this past week” at the JUCO-level program.  Butte is one of the premier JUCO football schools in the country, and served as the launching pad for what some would call a mildly successful playing career for Aaron Rodgers.

“He chose this move to keep his grades up and not lose a year of football,” Garmon’s father, Tony Hollingsworth, told the website. “He figured a (junior) college would fit him well while staying focused on his (school) work with less distraction from a major university atmosphere during the second semester there.

“He felt that Iowa scheme was not his style of play so this was the best move for him.”

Garmon was a four-star member of Iowa’s 2012 recruiting class, rated as the No. 19 running back in the country coming out of Erie, Pa.  As a true freshman last season, Garmon finished third on the team in rushing with 122 yards.  He also caught eight passes for 57 yards, and was credited with one pot possession charge in June.

If/when Garmon makes the move back to the FBS level, he would have three years of eligibility remaining.  And, provided he can get himself squared away, he shouldn’t be lacking suitors; leading up to signing day last year, he held offers from, among myriad others, Arkansas, Florida State, Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, Tennessee, Texas A&M and West Virginia.

USC’s Max Tuerk already questionable for Notre Dame game

TUCSON, AZ - OCTOBER 11:  Center Max Tuerk #75 of the USC Trojans prepares to snap the football during the college football game against the Arizona Wildcats at Arizona Stadium on October 11, 2014 in Tucson, Arizona.  The Trojans defeatred the Wildcats 28-26.  (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

As if the questions about the head coach’s future aren’t enough, now USC could have a rather significant issue in the middle of its offensive line to deal with as well.

Early in the first quarter of what would turn out to be an embarrassing loss to Washington Thursday night, Max Tuerk sustained a sprained knee. Upon further examination, it was determined that the veteran center would be unable to return to the game.

Not only that, Tuerk, who was wearing a brace on his right knee following the loss, is already labeled as questionable for what it in every sense of the phrase a must-win game for Steve Sarkisian against Notre Dame eight days from now.

With Tuerk sidelined for the remainder of the game, he was replaced by Toa Lobendahn. It’s unclear which direction the Trojans would go if Tuerk is a no-go this weekend, although Khaliel Rodgers, who had been dealing with a personal issue, has been Tuerk’s backup.

Tuerk has started 38 games in his Trojan career — 18 at center, 14 at left guard, five at left tackle, one at right tackle. Lobendahn started all 13 games as a true freshman last season, the first eight at left guard and then five at right tackle.

Was Washington loss the beginning of the end of the Steve Sarkisian era at USC?

Steve Sarkisian

Steve Sarkisian’s win totals in his six previous seasons are both a positive and a negative.

On one hand, he resurrected a moribund Washington program that went 0-12 under Ty Willingham in 2008 and took them to four consecutive bowl games from 2010-2013. He won nine games his last year in Seattle, then led a talented-yet-thin USC team to a nine-win season and AP No. 20 finish in 2014.

Those are good accomplishments. But the flip side of the argument is Sarkisian has never won double-digit games in a season, something that’s a necessity to keep one’s job at USC. The Trojans’ 17-12 loss to Washington last night — at home, no less — means the road to 10 wins and a Pac-12 title will be awfully difficult.

And worse yet, there are plenty of arguments to be made Sarkisian doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt and a little more time in Los Angeles to turn things around (#SarkAfterDark, his drunken rant at a booster event, certainly doesn’t help). The reaction from national media to last night’s loss looked like this:

Mandel, in his column, argued USC is right where it was two years ago with Lane Kiffin as its coach. And there’s this embarrassing thought, that looks more and more like a truth, for Pat Haden:

This one, however, was the most damning by far for many reasons, most notably that it came at the hands of Sarkisian’s old team. The sense among many Washington fans nearly two years ago was that the Huskies managed to upgrade coaches when the school lured Chris Petersen from Boise State upon Sarkisian’s departure to USC.

They were right.

USA Today’s Dan Wolken similarly wrote that USC needs to drop Sarkisian and bring in Chip Kelly from the Philadelphia Eagles.

This is the state of USC, and it may not get better. The Trojans start a brutal three-game stretch next Saturday at Notre Dame in primetime, then welcome Utah to Los Angeles the next week. A Halloween trip to Berkeley to face Jared Goff and Cal finishes it up. There’s a very real chance USC, for all its talent and all its hype, limps into November with a 4-4 or 3-5 record.

Sarkisian will have to engineer and sustain a major turnaround in these coming weeks, otherwise he’ll give Haden all the ammo he needs to unceremoniously jettison him after two years.