Recruiting has blossomed into a 365-day-a-year event, just like college football, the parent that spawned it. There’s more attention on 17 and 18-year-old high school kids now — and, sometimes, younger than that — than there’s ever been. To be a recruit, especially a blue-chip, in 2013 is filled with higher highs and lower lows. Rarely is there middle ground.
But it can be an exciting time for recruits. As our guy Michael Felder has pointed out on several occasions, it’s not until players reach the NFL — if they reach the pros at all — that they’ll have this much control again over their future.
Some coaches don’t believe a recruit should have that much control.
Mitch Sherman of ESPN’s RecrutingNation writes an intriguing and well-done piece about no-visit policies, which you can read HERE, where coaches tell recruits up front that if they’re committed to the program, the program is committed to them.
If they’re not, the school drops them.
The piece specifically mentions Texas, Michigan, Oregon and Georgia Tech as programs with no-visit policies. Yellow Jackets coach Paul Johnson has gained a certain level of notoriety for it.
The hypocrisy is astounding. Sure, a coach may be up front with a recruit about not visiting other programs, but the idea that commitment is a two-way street is a myth.
For one, a verbal commitment is non-binding by nature. To treat it as anything else is misguided, and frankly, kind of stupid. The word of a 17-year-old kid really doesn’t mean anything of significance. That’s not an indictment against Joe Recruit as much as it is a statement about verbal commitments.
Secondly, and more obviously, coaches can do pretty much whatever the hell they want. Chip Kelly flirted with the NFL for the second year in a row and eventually left Oregon for the Philadelphia Eagles. Kelly had a better offer than Oregon, so he took it. Can you blame him? You shouldn’t. Likewise, a recruit has every right to explore another opportunity that he feels may be better for him without having to lose another opportunity.
Who knows, maybe the coach(es) that told the recruit he’s not allowed to visit other schools won’t be there when he steps foot on to campus. Notice the coaching carousel picked up again post-Signing Day?
Not every program does this obviously, and more often than not, you’re likely talking about a school that can get just about any player it wants every year. It’s also wise for a recruit not to “lock in” on a school or a coach and shut down their recruitment.
That still doesn’t make the no-visit policy right.