<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baylor replaces SMU with FCS team on 2013 slate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/baylor-replaces-smu-with-fcs-team-on-2013-slate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/baylor-replaces-smu-with-fcs-team-on-2013-slate/</link>
	<description>CollegeFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phuzzball</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/baylor-replaces-smu-with-fcs-team-on-2013-slate/#comment-127369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phuzzball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=235623#comment-127369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t be surprised when this game is close, or maybe even an upset. Wofford&#039;s Triple option is deadly and very hard to prepare for. They are very well-coached &amp; disciplined.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be surprised when this game is close, or maybe even an upset. Wofford&#8217;s Triple option is deadly and very hard to prepare for. They are very well-coached &amp; disciplined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bertenheim</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/baylor-replaces-smu-with-fcs-team-on-2013-slate/#comment-127334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bertenheim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=235623#comment-127334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is why the Big Ten &quot;agreement&quot; against FCS teams is great only in theory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why the Big Ten &#8220;agreement&#8221; against FCS teams is great only in theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drummerhoff</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/baylor-replaces-smu-with-fcs-team-on-2013-slate/#comment-127321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drummerhoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=235623#comment-127321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t about dumbing down the schedule.  This is about making sure you have 7 home games on your schedule to give your Athletic Dept the best possible chance of making money.

When Bayor&#039;s schedule came out with 6/6 home &amp; away and there was a game at SMU, it stuck out like a sore thumb.  
Maybe someone with access can review all BCS schools schedules.  I am willing to bet just a handful of BCS schools have less than 7 home games.

Remember:  That is the reason why we have a 12 game schedule.  BCS schools told us they were going to do this when the schedule changed from 11 to 12 games per season... and they literally said we are allowing a 12th game so we can have an extra home game each year!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t about dumbing down the schedule.  This is about making sure you have 7 home games on your schedule to give your Athletic Dept the best possible chance of making money.</p>
<p>When Bayor&#8217;s schedule came out with 6/6 home &amp; away and there was a game at SMU, it stuck out like a sore thumb.<br />
Maybe someone with access can review all BCS schools schedules.  I am willing to bet just a handful of BCS schools have less than 7 home games.</p>
<p>Remember:  That is the reason why we have a 12 game schedule.  BCS schools told us they were going to do this when the schedule changed from 11 to 12 games per season&#8230; and they literally said we are allowing a 12th game so we can have an extra home game each year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manchestermiracle</title>
		<link>http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/baylor-replaces-smu-with-fcs-team-on-2013-slate/#comment-127317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manchestermiracle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=235623#comment-127317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emulating the SEC is usually a good thing for other conferences, but this trend isn&#039;t one of those times. 

It would be nice if schools could follow through on commitments in their schedules, but there are often mitigating circumstances that don&#039;t allow advanced notice when cancelling games. In SMU&#039;s case this also isn&#039;t one of those times. 

SMU decided it&#039;s non-conference schedule was too hard and replace Baylor with Montana State. Good for the Bobcats, bad for SMU&#039;s strength of schedule. I&#039;ll be so glad when SOS becomes a much bigger piece of the ratings pie.

A strong non-con schedule can only help to prepare your team for the conference grind. Too many teams think they have a chance to go undefeated and play in the national title game when they should be realistic and prepare to try and win their conference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emulating the SEC is usually a good thing for other conferences, but this trend isn&#8217;t one of those times. </p>
<p>It would be nice if schools could follow through on commitments in their schedules, but there are often mitigating circumstances that don&#8217;t allow advanced notice when cancelling games. In SMU&#8217;s case this also isn&#8217;t one of those times. </p>
<p>SMU decided it&#8217;s non-conference schedule was too hard and replace Baylor with Montana State. Good for the Bobcats, bad for SMU&#8217;s strength of schedule. I&#8217;ll be so glad when SOS becomes a much bigger piece of the ratings pie.</p>
<p>A strong non-con schedule can only help to prepare your team for the conference grind. Too many teams think they have a chance to go undefeated and play in the national title game when they should be realistic and prepare to try and win their conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
