North Carolina v South Carolina

Packers CEO: College union would pressure NFL for developmental league


A year ago there was a silly conversation centered around whether or not South Carolina’s Jadeveon Clowney should sit out the 2013 college football season to focus on training for life in the NFL. It was ridiculous in concept because there really is no replacing college football in the fall for any potential NFL player thinking about the draft. But what if there was?

This week Northwestern football players organized to take the first steps forward in developing an official college pliers union. While paying players is not quite at the top of the budding organization’s agenda, it is common belief that if and when this union takes off that the idea of players receiving pay beyond typical scholarship values may not be too far down the road. If college football players are one day going to be paid for their services, then the number of underclassmen declaring for the NFL Draft before playing thorough all of their eligible years may start to decline. This is a trend the NFL will be paying close attention to moving forward.

As Mike Florio references on Pro Football Talk, Green Bay Packers president and CEO Mark Murphy believes a college players union could spark the NFL to kick the tires on the idea of a developmental league of their own.

“[T]he NCAA colleges have served as a great breeding ground for NFL teams over the years,” Murphy said in response to a fan question submitted to “If the college players unionize, there will be more pressure on the NFL to establish a developmental league.”

It makes sense. Players with plenty of talent are taking an early gamble on the NFL earlier and earlier, as shown by the rising number of players declaring for the NFL The rising numbers have been influenced by the recent collective bargaining agreement for the NFL players union and the league, which has made it more important for players to get their service time in the league started earlier in order to cash in on bigger paychecks later in their career.

Just how much the players union in college football would slow that trend down may remain to be seen. The splitting of money for college players is still a complicated issue with many questions to answer before becoming a reality. If the NFL formed a developmental league it would make a push to lure in some of the top players who would typically be laying in the college game.

If an NFL developmental league existed today, would players like Clowney have played in that instead of South Carolina in 2013?

How much would players in the developmental league be paid? What kind of exposure would it get compared to college football?

Would an NFL developmental league take place in the fall, and thus compete head-to-head with college football?

These are just a sampling of questions that would have to be debated and answered in time. It is an idea that should be a concern for fans of the college game, but this is not exactly a concern that will take place over night.

Diagnosed with bovine leukemia, Bevo XIV retires immediately

Associated Press

Turns out Steve Spurrier isn’t the only iconic college football figure to retire this week.

Texas announced Tuesday evening Bevo XIV has been diagnosed with bovine leukemia and has been retired to his pasture, effective immediately.

Bevo XIV missed Saturday’s stunning upset of then-No. 10 Oklahoma with what the school called a “life threatening” illness, and rumors circulated around the internet this week he had passed away.

Bevo XIV officially hangs up his horns with a 106-41 record with two national championship appearances.

There is no word at press time on a possible debut of Bevo XV.

Dabo Swinney won’t stop talking about “Clemsoning”

Dabo Swinney
Associated Press

Urban Dictionary defines “Clemsoning” as “the act of an inexplicably disappointing performance, usually within the context of a college football season.”

Clemson head coach Dabo Swinney was asked about the phenomenon following the Tigers’ destruction of Georgia Tech Saturday and promptly went off. The question, asked by ESPN’s David Hale, was in reference to Swinney’s program shaking the label – Saturday marked Clemson’s 34th straight win over an unranked opponent – but Swinney didn’t see it that way.

Armed with some new facts (Clemson SID Tim Bourret noted 50 teams have fallen as ranked opponents to unranked foes since the Tigers last did so on Nov. 19, 2011), Swinney again targeted the “Clemsoning” label.

“I think it’s an agenda. It’s just bias,” Swinney told the Charleston (S.C.) Post & Courier Tuesday. “People are uneducated. They’re just ignorant and lazy because they’re not looking at the facts. If they did, they’d be focused on other schools and not Clemson. They’d be dialed in on what Clemson has done. There aren’t three other schools in the country as consistent as Clemson, in all aspects.”

I hate to break it to you, Dabo: you are absolutely correct, but the term, as they say, has been coined.

Just go beat Florida State, beat South Carolina, win the ACC and win a national title and maybe Urban Dictionary will delete that pesky page out of a sign of respect.

Also, No. 5 Clemson hosts unranked Boston College on Saturday. This would be a very, very unfortunate time for the Tigers to suffer an upset.