When it comes to keeping balance in a conference, giving every team an equal number of home and away games in conference play is the way to go. That is what the SEC will continue to do moving forward, opting to stick with eight-game schedules over nine-game schedules in conference play.
There is a little catch though, but it is a good one. The SEC will now require all members of the SEC to schedule at least one opponent from the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten or Pac-12 on an annual basis. For a number of teams this will be no problem due to existing non-conference rivalries. For others, the emphasis on scheduling opponents from power conferences will have to be made.
Florida (Florida State), Georgia (Georgia Tech), Kentucky (Louisville), and South Carolina (Clemson) already have existing annual rivalry games with opponents from another conference. In this case, each opponent comes from the ACC. What other SEC schools do to find scheduling partners on an annual basis should be intriguing. Will new annual rivalries develop or will schools mix up the future opponents to keep things fresh. Is this what will be needed to get Texas A&M and Texas back together? Well, let’s slow down just one second.
“This has been a thoughtful and deliberative process that has resulted in maintaining the current format and adds a provision that will bolster our collective annual non-conference schedule,” said Commissioner Mike Slive. “The concept of strength-of-schedule is based on an entire 12-game schedule, a combination of both conference games together with non-conference games. Given the strength of our conference schedule supplemented by at least one major non-conference game, our teams will boast of a strong resume’ of opponents each and every year.”
The SEC also paired up the permanent SEC cross-division match-ups. They are:
- Alabama (west) vs. Tennessee (east)
- Arkansas (west) vs. Missouri (east)
- Auburn (west) vs. Georgia (east)
- LSU (west) vs. Florida (east)
- Ole Miss (west) vs. Vanderbilt (east)
- Mississippi State (west) vs. Kentucky (east)
- Texas A&M (west) vs. South Carolina (east)
The first month of the football season at Rutgers has had its share of off-field stories worth keeping an eye on, so the news on Tuesday that the university has hired Bond, Schoeneck & King, a law firm with a history of working on NCAA violation cases, is certainly a bit of an eye-opener. The NCAA is not, at this time, investigating Rutgers. Instead, this is a move to investigate a pair of concerns related to the football program so that they may be properly reported to the NCAA if and when needed.
“Rutgers has retained outside counsel with expertise in NCAA infractions to help identify any potential rules violations,” Rutgers senior vice president for external affairs Peter McDonough said in a report published by NJ.com. “This is an ongoing and rigorous process that helps us to identify any shortcomings, to self-report them as required by NCAA rules and to remedy them as best practices demand.”
According to the report from NJ.com, Rutgers is focusing on one allegation of an arrested player failing multiple drug tests while on the team and accusations related to the program’s ambassador program. The name of the former player was not identified in the report. The ambassador program has come into scrutiny following the evolving case related to wide receiver Leonte Carroo.
The hired firm tends to serve as a liaison with the NCAA, but Rutgers will be given a final copy of the firm’s investigation for review. If Rutgers determines any NCAA violations were commited as determined by the report, that information will be passed on to the NCAA. The information revealed or uncovered in the firm’s investigation will determine if the NCAA will have to do some of its own digging, or merely adopt the firm’s report at face value and decide on any appropriate punishment from there.
Rutgers wide receiver Leonte Carroo could have a charge of simple assault dropped by a New Jersey court today. The woman he is accused of slamming to the concrete has agreed to drop the restraining order request and has asked the assault charge against the Rutgers receiver be dropped as well. NJ.com reports today the woman and Carroo each appeared in a family court on Tuesday, and the woman told the judge she is not scared of Carroo.
So, what does this mean for football? Simply put, it means Carroo may be eligible to play again as soon as this weekend. That would be good timing, as Rutgers is set to host Michigan State this Saturday night.
Carroo has been sitting out while serving an indefinite suspension while this legal process plays out. Carroo has missed each of the last two games for Rutgers, against Penn State and Kansas. Rutgers was off this past weekend. If this legal process does play out as it is expected at this point, Carroo could be reinstated quickly and promptly, making him eligible to return right away. Carroo is one fo the best players on the roster, so having him back and eligible to play is very good news for the Scarlet Knights offense.