The ACC and Big Ten spring meetings are going on in different locations, but the same absurd topic is being discussed in each. Both conferences are openly discussing the possibility of having members schedule other conference members in non-conference match-ups that would not count in the conference standings.
In the Big Ten meetings, Penn State Athletics Director Dave Joyner says the Big Ten is hinting it is a possibility as the conference looks to figuring out how to fill non-conference schedules with FCS teams being cut from the list of options.
“That’s a unique concept we could talk about more,” Joyner said according to ESPN.com. “That’s a possibility.”
The ACC announced this week the conference will maintain a football schedule consisting of eight conference games and require each member to schedule one team from a power conference each season. For most schools in the ACC, this will be no issue with a handful of teams already having locked rivalry games against SEC rivals and with Notre Dame appearing on schedules on a rotating basis in future years (Notre Dame will fulfill the requirement). A non-conference match-up between ACC members would count toward fulfilling that non-conference requirement. Should it?
Openly discussing all of the options on the table is just fine. That is what these meetings are for, to figure out ways to best serve the conference in a changing landscape. But do not be fooled into thinking this is ever going to actually happen. Conference teams playing each other in non-conference match-ups may serve fans well and provide for more attractive games for most, it ultimately does the conference more harm by hurting overall conference strength of schedule and win totals. Imagine the Big Ten having one bowl spot left unfilled because one of their teams lost to another Big Ten team in a non-conference match-up. The school loses out on a potential win that could have been picked up by scheduling another school and the conference ends up missing out on more bowl revenue.
It is a unique discussion, and perhaps in certain situations a rare match-up could make sense, but it just is not something that will serve the conference’s best interests. Until college football expands to a 14-game regular season, the problems with conference scheduling will continue to unfold.
Odds are pretty good Steve Spurrier has coached his final game as the Head Ball Coach, but Spurrier let it be known he is not going to go away quite as easily as you might think. Spurrier addressed the media today as South Carolina made its transition between coaches official. Spurrier noted he is resigning as head coach, but he is not necessarily retiring. As previously reported, Shawn Elliott will take on the role as interim head coach of the Gamecocks effective immediately.
The first thing Spurrier wants to remind everybody is he is not retiring. This is simply a resignation from his current position. Spurrier left the door open to possible options down the road for him in his post-coaching career. The idea of Spurrier walking away from the football world never to be heard from again is a startling one, so it is good to know he is not going to let that happen.
“College football is a game of recruiting, as well know,” Spurrier said when assessing why it was right for him to leave his job now. “That’s another reason I need to move on. I don’t know if coaching is completely over or not. It is fun being on a team. I might be a consultant for someone. I doubt if I’ll be a head coach again, but who knows?”
Spurrier said he realized Sunday the time to walk away was now and explained he always knew he would need to step aside the moment he saw himself holding the program back. That echoes the sentiment he has shared over the years, especially when asked about coaches like Joe Paterno and Bobby Bowden as they each got up in the years. This season South Carolina is off to a 2-4 start, so the writing was on the wall for Spurrier, who also said it was in the best interests for all if an inevitable change was handled immediately.
“We’ve slipped. It’s my fault. I’m the head coach,” Spurrier said of South Carolina’s recent struggles.”We haven’t lost it. We’ve got a dang good team.”
“Our team is not in shambles despite what some might say,” Elliott said when he was given a chance to speak to the media. “We’re going to do everything we can to make the University of South Carolina proud of this football program.”
Elliott will now have the rest of the season to show what he can do as a head coach, and he knows this will be a bit of an open audition for the job as South Carolina starts searching for its next head coach.
Michigan State has become a national power under the coaching of Mark Dantonio. The grizzled and confident coach has put together a master plan in East Lansing and has taken the Spartans to the top of the Big Ten along the way, capturing a Big Ten title and victories in the Cotton Bowl and Rose Bowl as well as in-state dominance over the Michigan Wolverines. Danotnio is preparing his Spartans to take on the Wolverines this week, but with the new vacancy opening up at South Carolina following the sudden retirement of Steve Spurrier, Dantonio has already been presented with the question about his thoughts on coaching at South Carolina.
He did not seem all that interested in discussing the vacancy when meeting with Michigan State media this morning.
“Coach Spurrier’s had an outstanding career there, it’s alma mater, and we’re here to talk about Michigan,” Dantonio said when asked about it today. Video below from the Big Ten Network…
Dantonio played defensive back for the Gamecocks in the mid 1970s, which helps make Dantonio an interesting name to mention in any coaching future discussion out of Columbia. While Dantonio may have played at South Carolina for Jim Carlen, Dantonio grew up in Ohio and has coached the bulk of his career within Ohio and the Big Ten. He is also one win away from picking up his 100th career coaching victory, 81 of which have come at Michigan State.