Vanderbilt v Texas A&M

Texas A&M QB competition a two horse race


Who will be the successor to Johnny Manziel at Texas A&M? This is one of the biggest questions surrounding the Aggies entering year three as a member of the SEC. So who will it be? It looks like a two-man competition, which was evident once Matt Joeckel decided to transfer (to TCU) in May.

Kyle Allen and Kenny Hill appear to be the leading candidates for the job this summer, as profiled in a team snapshot preview published by The Dallas Morning News. The two candidates could not be more different in their approach to the offense. Will Kevin Sumlin end up going with a pro-style quarterback and hope for the same results he once had with Case Keenum at Houston, or will he go with the more mobile option and look to continue playing a style of football that was put on display with Johnny Football making magic happen, winning a Heisman Trophy in the process?

Hill ran into some legal trouble this offseason following a public intoxication incident during the spring. He was suspended by the Aggies but has been reinstated. Hill has slightly more experience after backing up Manziel last season when the starter was given a rest. Will the off-field trouble come into play? If it does, Allen appears to be a capable candidate as well. Allen has the skill and the upside potential but lacks the experience despite enrolling early.

Texas A&M will have another potential candidate for the quarterback job in 2015 after receiving a verbal commitment from dual-threat player Kyler Murray. With the recruiting of Murray it would seem to suggest Sumlin would prefer to open up the offense with a more mobile quarterback. Of course, Allen was one of the top quarterback recruits as well and he plays a pro-style offense, so it may be anyone’s guess which way Sumlin ends up going. It could simply boil down to which quarterback is able to move the offense more consistently and effectively. Will Texas A&M work better with a pro-style quarterback or a dual-threat? That is actually the more important question to address this summer.

So, who do you think will lead the Aggies offense when Texas A&M opens up the 2014 season on Thursday, August 28 at South Carolina?

Appalachian State announces five-year extension for head coach Scott Satterfield

Scott Satterfield
Associated Press
1 Comment

One day after it was revealed its head coach was the second-lowest paid in college football, Appalachian State announced a five-year contract extension for head coach Scott Satterfield.

“We have the right coach leading our football program in Scott Satterfield,” Appalachian State AD Doug Gillin said in a statement. “In nearly three years as head coach, he has stayed true to his convictions, built the program the right way and set Appalachian State football up for sustainable success both in the Sun Belt Conference and at the national level.”

Satterfield had earned $375,000 annually, ahead of only Louisiana-Monroe’s Todd Berry at $360,000 a year.

Satterfield, 42, is 14-14 in his third season at the Boone, N.C., school. He led the Mountaineers to a 7-5 mark in their debut Sun Belt season, and has the club at 3-1 to start the 2015 campaign.

“It’s exciting for my family and me to know that we’re going to be at Appalachian for the foreseeable future,” Satterfield added. “I’m living a dream by being the head coach at my alma mater and can’t wait to continue to work hard to help this program reach heights that it has never reached before.”

Wisconsin announces 10-year agreement with Under Armour

Joel Stave
Associated Press

What has long been rumored became fact Friday, as Wisconsin announced a 10-year agreement with Under Armour.

“I am absolutely thrilled about our new partnership with Under Armour,” AD Barry Alvarez said in a statement. “Kevin Plank and his team have established a brand that fits perfectly with the Wisconsin athletics story and culture. Our primary focus at Wisconsin is, of course, our student-athletes, and Under Armour’s passion and commitment to high quality and innovation will benefit our student-athletes for years to come. Our entire department is looking forward to a long and mutually productive relationship with the Under Armour team.”

The new deal will pay the Badgers a total of $7 million in cash and product in 2015-16 and is valued at $96 million over the life of the contract, good for second in the Big Ten, trailing only Nike’s new contract with Michigan.

Hidden within the contract are two nuggets that UA offered to sway the Badgers away from Adidas, from the Portland Business Journal:

Wisconsin will get as much as $500,000 from Under Armour to “rebrand” athletic facilities. It’ll get $150,000 to build out an Under Armour retail space in a campus gift shop called Bucky’s Locker Room. It also gets two summer internships for students at Under Armour’s Baltimore headquarters.

“The University of Wisconsin is an institution built on the highest values of academic excellence, and we are extremely proud to be teaming up with one of the most vibrant, distinctive and successful athletic programs in the country to help elevate the performance of all Badgers with innovative footwear and apparel,” added Plank.

Wisconsin’s departure continues to weaken the stronghold Adidas had built in the Midwest after losing Michigan to Nike and Notre Dame to Under Armour in recent years (the company still owns apparel rights for Indiana and Nebraska). The Badgers are now the 41st Division I athletics department and 17th FBS program to join UA.