As college football moves into the College Football Playoff era there are many questions that may not be answered until working through year one. One of the questions that appears to be a sticking point for som is the debate on whether or not power conferences should be obligated to schedule eight or nine conference games? The impact an eight-game conference schedule has compared to the impact a nine-game conference schedule carries is impossible to measure, and one year under the new playoff format is not going to bring a definitive answer.
The SEC recently announced it will stick with an eight-game conference schedule but will require members to schedule at least one opponent from another power conference — the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten or Pac-12. The ACC appears to be leaning toward sticking with an eight-game schedule, which comes with guaranteed games against Notre Dame spread throughout the conference on a rotating schedule. The Big 12 and Pac-12 have adopted the nine-game schedule and the expanding Big Ten will move to a nine-game schedule starting in 2016.
What makes the schedule so important heading into 2014 is the idea that the selection committee for the College Football Playoff will be taking consideration on overall résumé and strength of schedule. For the power conferences it is assumed by some that scheduling more conference games will increase the overall strength of schedule, and thus give members of that conference a better shot at making the four-team playoff. But doing so takes one game away form the non-conference schedule and some schools need that extra non-conference game to help boost the odds of getting to bowl eligibility.
Simply put, some conferences benefit more by moving to nine game conference schedules than others might. Why should any conference expand a conference schedule if it puts any of its members at risk in any way?
Nobody knows what the actual playoff equation will be this coming season, especially when a single game has not even been played yet. For now the variable is undefined and the equation is impossible to solve at this time.
Another day (hour?), another award paring down its field of players eligible to win this year’s honor.
The latest to do as much is the Outland Trophy, with the award that is handed out annually to the nation’s top interior lineman on either side of the ball announcing the eight semifinalists for this year’s honor. Headlining the most recent group is Houston’s Ed Oliver, who was the 2017 Outland winner.
Top-ranked Alabama (offensive tackle Jonah Williams, nose guard Quinnen Williams) and second-ranked Clemson (offensive tackle Mitch Hyatt, defensive tackle Christian Wilkins) accounted for half of the eight semifinalists. The other three semifinalists not already mentioned are North Carolina State center Garrett Bradbury, Wisconsin guard Michael Deiter and Oklahoma guard Ben Powers.
Next week, this group of eight semifinalists will be pared down to three finalists. The winner of the 2018 Outland Trophy will be announced during the Home Depot College Football Awards show on ESPN in early December.
For the second straight week, Ohio State will be down a man in its linebacking corps.
Earlier this week, Urban Meyer listed Baron Browning as probable for Saturday’s game against Maryland. Wednesday night after practice, however, the head coach confirmed that the linebacker will not play against the Terrapins.
Browning is dealing with an unspecified injury that sidelined the sophomore linebacker for the win over Michigan State this past Saturday.
Through eight games in 2018, Browning has been credited with 22 tackles, 3½ tackles for loss and a sack. As noted by ElevenWarriors.com, Browning has been rotating in with Tuf Borland at the middle linebacker spot throughout the season.
A five-star 2017 signee, Browning played in a dozen games as a true freshman last year.
Tuesday night, Western Michigan was officially removed from MAC West contention. Less than 24 hours later, WMU removed one of its top assistants.
Wednesday night, the Broncos announced that they have “parted ways” with defensive coordinator Tim Daoust. The move comes after WMU gave up 42 points in a loss to a three-win Ball State team that came into the game 99th in the country in scoring (24.5 points per game).
All told, the Broncos gave up 51, 59 and 42 points in three straight losses that knocked them out of the West race and handed the division title to Northern Illinois.
“I appreciate Tim and his family’s dedication to the Bronco football family these past two seasons,” head coach Tim Lester said in a statement. “At this time I felt we needed to go in a different direction.”
This was Daoust’s second stint in Kalamazoo as he was an assistant with the Broncos from 2006-09. Prior to this two-year stint at WMU, Daoust was the coordinator at Ball State.
Daoust will be replaced for the remainder of the year by defensive line coach and co-defensive coordinator Lou Esposito. WMU, which is bowl-eligible for a school-record fifth-straight year, will close out the 2018 regular season against West champion NIU next Tuesday.
A conference known for its defense is front and center for an award that honors that side of the ball.
Of the five finalists for the 2018 Bronko Nagurski Trophy announced Wednesday by the Football Writers Association of America, three of them hail from the SEC — Kentucky linebacker Josh Allen, LSU safety Grant Delpit and Alabama nose guard Quinnen Williams. The other two –Michigan linebacker Devin Bush, Clemson defensive tackle Christian Wilkins — come from teams which are ranked in the top four of the most recent College Football Playoff rankings.
North Carolina State’s Bradley Chubb was the 2017 winner of the Nagurski. Houston’s Ed Oliver was a finalist for that award and was eligible again this year, but a knee injury has sidelined him for the last three games and will likely keep him out for a fourth — if not longer.
The 2018 winner will be honored at a Dec. 3 ceremony in Charlotte.