Willie Lyles: rumors about Seastrunk and Peterson ‘unequivocally false’


Technically speaking, Willie Lyles is the owner and operator of the Houston-based company, Complete Scouting Services. But a pile of accusations over the past couple of months stemming from potential recruiting violations at Oregon and LSU have landed pimp master Lyles and said programs under the NCAA microscope.

And in his first “tell-all” with FoxSports.com‘s  Jason Whitlock since the initial reports, Lyles said (surprise!) that the recruiting concerns about Oregon running back Lache Seastrunk and LSU DB Patrick Peterson were blatantly untrue.

“That is unequivocally false,” Lyles said on Whitlock’s podcast. “(Lache) chose Oregon because he felt Oregon was the best fit for him. He liked the running backs coach, Gary Campbell, and he felt it was a good system and a good fit for him. (Lache) enjoyed the campus when he went on his visit and he enjoyed the people. He made the decision that was best for him.”

Lyles also “unequivocally” denied that a conversation between him and Texas A&M cornerbacks coach Van Malone ever happened. Malone said in a March interview with ESPN that Lyles contacted him in 2007 insisting that if the Aggies wanted Peterson, they would have to pay $80,000.

However, Lyles did offer an interesting excuse, er, “counterpoint” on why he felt his name was being kicked around in the dirt like an old soccer ball.

It’s Texas’ fault. One-hundred percent.

“There’s a particular entity out there that would like to see the movement of players from the state of Texas to schools out of state stopped,” Lyles said. “It’s been well-documented on the blogosphere stating those objections and stating those issues with kids leaving the state of Texas.

“That would be the University of Texas and they do have a problem with people leaving the state of Texas.”

Talk about ridiculous accusations. The state of Texas has a wealth of athletes; keeping them all within state borders is impossible. And let’s be honest: the University of Texas hauls in a Top-1o recruiting class practically every year filled with almost exclusively in-state recruits who start giving verbal commitments soon after the previous signing day ends.

To suggest that the “entity” has singled out Lyles because a few recruits chose to leave the state is “unequivocally” like  the 23-year-old kid flipping burgers at McDonalds holding a grudge against “the man” who’s keeping him down.

Lyles may have taken the interview with Whitlock to clear his name, but he really did just as much to tarnish his “reputation” as anyone in the media, or institution of higher education, ever could.

In fact, a rather famous quote by one Abraham Lincoln comes to mind.

Rutgers WR Carroo expected to have assault charges dropped

Leonte Carroo
Leave a comment

Rutgers wide receiver Leonte Carroo could have a charge of simple assault dropped by a New Jersey court today. The woman he is accused of slamming to the concrete has agreed to drop the restraining order request and has asked the assault charge against the Rutgers receiver be dropped as well. NJ.com reports today the woman and Carroo each appeared in a family court on Tuesday, and the woman told the judge she is not scared of Carroo.

So, what does this mean for football? Simply put, it means Carroo may be eligible to play again as soon as this weekend. That would be good timing, as Rutgers is set to host Michigan State this Saturday night.

Carroo has been sitting out while serving an indefinite suspension while this legal process plays out. Carroo has missed each of the last two games for Rutgers, against Penn State and Kansas. Rutgers was off this past weekend. If this legal process does play out as it is expected at this point, Carroo could be reinstated quickly and promptly, making him eligible to return right away. Carroo is one fo the best players on the roster, so having him back and eligible to play is very good news for the Scarlet Knights offense.

Gamecocks still hope to host LSU Sat., but alternatives being evaluated

David Williams, Tony Guerad

The recent flooding in the state of South Carolina has brought many dangers and concerns much more important than football with it, but this being a college football-focused website we must dive into the connection real life issues have with the sport from time to time. South Carolina is scheduled to host LSU in Columbia this Saturday, and that still appears to be the plan. Alternate plans have been discussed though, just in case they will be needed as the week unfolds.

The very concept of moving a college football game to another stadium is indeed a rare situation. It is not, however, completely without precedent. The 1942 Rose Bowl between Duke and Oregon State (my how the times have changed) was moved from Pasadena, California across the country to be played in Durham, North Carolina. This was out of fear of the west coast being attacked during World War II though. LSU’s Tiger Stadium has served as a home football stadium for a weather-related event in the past as well. The New Orleans Saints played four games in Baton Rouge after Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans and forced the Saints to play the entire 2005 season on the road.

Today is only Tuesday, so there is still some time to make sure Williams-Brice Stadium and the surrounding area is suitable for hosting the SEC contest this weekend. Odds are the game will be able to be played as scheduled, but safety for fans and teams involved is always the priority.